Matthew 1: 1-17 | 17th December Advent Weekday (Audio Bible, Spoken Word)
1 THE book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.
2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren;
3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;
4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon;
5 And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse;
6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias;
7 And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa;
8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias;
9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias;
10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias;
11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon:
12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel;
13 And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor;
14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud;
15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob;
16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.
Christ is to be saviour of all mankind, in accordance with the promise to Abraham, and he is to bring an everlasting kingdom to the Jewish people, as prophesized to King David. He is identified right at the start of Matthew’s Gospel as the son of David and the son of Abraham. From one perspective, the genealogy then presented confirms these truths and roots Christ in a line that is itself a record of salvation history, which in the birth of the Son of God reaches its climax.
Genealogies were of tremendous importance for the Jews because they were seen as doing much to define a person’s identity, this because of the nomadic origins of the people, such that place of birth would be of lesser importance. Great care would be taken to record and preserve genealogies, the details of which could entail certain rights and duties. Christ’s genealogy follows a threefold division, each of 14 generations, 14 being the number of David, first from Abraham to David, then from David to the Babylonian exile, and thence to Christ. We move, then, from the promise to Abraham to the temporary fulfilment of a great kingdom under David, through the falling away through sin into defeat and exile, and the hope of the Messiah to come.
As companions to Mary, four women are, unusually, mentioned in the genealogy: Tamar, Rahab, Bathsheba and Ruth. The character of these women is also unusual. They are foreigners. Two are certainly sinners – Tamar disguised herself as a prostitute to oblige the Patriarch Judah, her father-in-law, to be faithful to the law by impregnating her (Genesis 38); Rahab was a prostitute who helped the Israelites by betraying Jericho (Joshua 2). In the case of Bathsheba, while there is sin, we might say that she perhaps is more the victim of sin, as King David seduces and has sex with her, then has her husband Uriah killed (2 Samuel 11).
The four companions, then, are quite different from Mary. They are outsiders – outside of Jewish norms – and they would be understood to need redemption, grace, to bring them into the fold. Through this, the teaching is reinforced that Christ came to call all of us. God saves us and calls us to do good despite our sins, and He has left evidence of this in the Son’s genealogy.
There is, though, a further twist on this record of ancestry, of identity. ‘Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren…’ Or: ‘Abraham the father of Isaac, and Isaac the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of…’ And so on. Only at the last step does the terminology change, the pattern abruptly halt: ‘…and Matthan begat Jacob; And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.’ Not, then, and for obvious reasons, ‘Joseph begat Jesus’, or ‘Joseph the father of Jesus’; rather, ‘Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus’.
The virgin birth – Christ born of Mary and the Holy Spirit. At the climax, the pinnacle, of Christ’s genealogy, that whole male line of father to son through the ages, since Genesis, might simply evaporate and Mary and Jesus could still be there, true, divine identity intact. It is a suggestive textual moment: Christ comes to us as the highpoint of salvation history – we have in the genealogy rehearsed the Old Testament – and he slips in, as it were, from the outside, into history, someone quite new, free of history, his identity pre-defined outside of history, and come to redeem history, through his mother.
‘Father, by your will your Son took upon himself that human nature which you fashioned and redeemed. Grant that the Word who took flesh in the womb of the ever-virgin Mary and became a man like us, may share with us his godhead. We make our prayer through Christ our Lord. Amen’
Christian Art | Parousia | Second Coming | Lamb Of God, You Take Away The Sins Of The World Luke 17: 26-37 (Audio Bible KJV, Spoken Word) Early Christian thought about the Parousia – the second coming – was largely influenced by the teachings of Jesus and the writings of Saint Paul. In the early Christian community, expectation of Christ’s return was strong, and many Christians believed that it would happen in their lifetime. This belief is evident in the New Testament, where the authors express a sense of urgency in their writings and encourage their readers to be prepared for Christ’s imminent return. As Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire, the idea of the Parousia became more complex and nuanced. Theological debates arose around the nature of Christ’s return and the events that would precede it. Some theologians, such as Origen and Augustine, saw the Parousia as a spiritual event that was already happening in the Church. Others, such as the Montanists and the millenarians, believed in a literal, physical return of Christ and the establishment of a new, earthly Kingdom. In the Middle Ages, the Parousia was often associated with apocalypticism and the idea of a final, cataclysmic battle between good and evil – the last battle. The idea of the Antichrist, who would precede Christ’s return, became a popular theme in Christian literature, and the book of Revelation (Apocalypse – meaning to reveal, to uncover) was interpreted as a prophetic guide to the end of the world. Biblical Basis For The Parousia | The Second Coming The concept of the Parousia, or the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, is central to Christian eschatology and is supported by numerous biblical passages in both the Old and New Testaments. In the Old Testament, there are numerous passages that refer to the coming of a Messiah who will restore Israel and bring about the final judgment. For example, in Daniel 7:13-14, it is written: ‘I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.’ This passage describes a divine figure who comes in the clouds and is given dominion over all nations. In the New Testament, the Parousia is described in greater detail, particularly in the teachings of Jesus and the writings of Saint Paul. Jesus speaks of his return in many passages, including Matthew 24:30-31, where Jesus says: ‘And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.’ Here, Jesus describes his return in power and glory, accompanied by angels who gather Jesus’ elect from all over the world. In Saint Paul’s letters, the Parousia is also described in detail. In 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17, Saint Paul writes: ‘For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.’ This passage describes a resurrection of the dead and the gathering of believers to meet the Lord Jesus in the air. The language and imagery used to describe the Parousia are often dramatic and apocalyptic in nature. The Parousia is often described as a time of judgment, when the righteous will be separated from the wicked, and God’s justice will be fully revealed. The imagery of clouds, trumpets, and angels is used to depict the power and glory of Christ’s return. Theological Interpretations Of The Parousia | Jesus’ Second Coming The concept of the Parousia has been interpreted in a variety of ways throughout Christian history. Dispensationalism Dispensationalism is a theological framework that emerged in the 19th Century and has since become popular among some evangelical and fundamentalist Christians. Dispensationalists believe that history is divided into distinct periods or ‘dispensations’, each of which is marked by a particular mode of divine revelation and a specific plan of salvation. According to dispensationalist theology, the Parousia will be preceded by a period of tribulation, during which the Antichrist will establish a one-world government and the Jews will be restored to their homeland. The Parousia itself will involve a physical, visible return of Christ, who will establish a thousand-year reign on earth before the final judgment. Preterism Preterism is a theological interpretation of the Parousia that holds that many of the prophecies in the New Testament, particularly those in the book of Revelation, were fulfilled in the first century AD. According to this view, the Parousia occurred in a spiritual sense when Christ ascended to heaven and sent the Holy Spirit to empower the Church. Preterists argue that the tribulation and other end-time events predicted in the New Testament were fulfilled in the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in AD 70. Postmillennialism Postmillennialism is a theological view that holds that the Parousia will occur after a period of history in which the Church will gradually bring about the kingdom of God on earth. According to this view, the Church will spread the gospel throughout the world, and social, political, and economic conditions will gradually improve. Eventually, Christ will return to a world that has been largely transformed by the Gospel. Amillennialism […]
This passage from Procopius of Gaza presents an extended allegorical reading of the Book of Proverbs, particularly the figure of Wisdom as host and builder. It integrates themes of creation, anthropology, the Incarnation, and sacramental life into a unified theological vision. The method is characteristically patristic: scriptural imagery is not treated in isolation but read in light of the whole economy of salvation [ … ]
The Dry Salvages, the third poem in T.S. Eliot’s Four Quartets, explores themes of time, human struggle, and a quest for understanding. Written in 1941, this poem explores imagery of the sea and river to depict and to interrogate forces that shape human life and destiny [ … ]
Search Google Here | A Holy Land Jerusalem Pilgrimage? | A Safari? | An Escape..