Loading...
Christian ArtDivine Office | Office Of Readings

Office Of Readings | Eastertide Week 4, Wednesday | A Reading From The Treatise Of Saint Hilary Of Poitiers On The Trinity

Boy At Prayer | Jesus And The Trinity In The Eucharist

Christian Art | A Boy At Prayer With Jesus And The Trinity In The Eucharist

Office Of Readings | Eastertide Week 4, Wednesday | A Reading From The Treatise Of Saint Hilary Of Poitiers On The Trinity | Jesus And The Trinity In The Eucharist 

‘The natural unity of the faithful in God through the incarnation of the Word and the sacrament of the eucharist.’

Historical Context | Saint Hilary And The Arian Controversy

Saint Hilary of Poitiers (c. 310–367) was a bishop and doctor of the Church known primarily for his role in defending the Nicene faith against Arianism. This heresy denied the full divinity of Christ and therefore threatened the entire theological foundation of the Incarnation, Trinity, and Eucharist. In his principal theological work, De Trinitate (‘On the Trinity’), Hilary argues forcefully for the unity of the divine and human in Christ. The Eucharistic theology expressed in this passage reflects and supports that Christological argument.

In Hilary’s logic, the Eucharist becomes the concrete expression and continuation of the Incarnation: the eternal Word, having assumed human flesh, remains bodily present in the sacrament of his Body and Blood. Through our reception of that sacrament, we are united with him not merely symbolically or spiritually, but organically and substantially.

Theological Structure | Eucharistic Incarnation And Indwelling

Hilary’s main claim is that our unity with Christ is not merely moral or intellectual, but natural—a participation in his very being, made possible through the sacrament of the Eucharist. He writes:

‘If the Word has truly been made flesh and we in very truth receive the Word made flesh as food from the Lord, are we not bound to believe that he abides in us naturally?’

This statement hinges on the premise of the Incarnation: if the eternal Word truly took on human nature, and if that human nature is truly received in the Eucharist, then we genuinely participate in the divine-human life of Christ. The term ‘naturally’ (naturaliter) here does not mean physically in a biological sense but refers to a real ontological union—a joining of being.

Hilary argues that this union is not only real but reciprocal: ‘He himself is in us through the flesh and we in him, and because we are united with him, our own being is in God.’ This reflects a classical patristic pattern of thought: the divine condescension (God becoming man) enables human exaltation (man sharing in divine life). This is the core of what Eastern theology calls theosis, and what Hilary, in Latin terms, expresses as indwelling and participation.

Eucharist As Fulfilment Of Christ’s Words

Hilary supports his theology by quoting Christ’s promise in John 14:

‘On that day you will understand that I am in my Father and you in me and I in you.’

Hilary takes this not as a metaphorical statement about shared moral aims or mutual love, but as a theological statement about ontological unity—our being joined to Christ in the same real way that Christ is united to the Father.

This understanding culminates in John 6:56:

‘He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood lives in me and I live in him.’

Hilary is adamant that these words must be taken seriously: the Eucharist is not a symbol of Christ’s presence, but the means by which Christ remains present in us and we in him. This is why Hilary insists that Christ ‘abides in us naturally’—a union made possible only because of the hypostatic union (Christ’s full divinity and full humanity) and sacramentally communicated in the Eucharist.

Theological Implications | The Nature Of Unity

Hilary’s thought suggests a vertical chain of communion:

  • Christ is in the Father by nature (as the eternal Son),
  • We are in Christ by sacramental incorporation,
  • Therefore, we are also united to the Father through Christ.

This ‘mediated unity’ does not dilute our relationship with God but secures it: because we receive Christ’s own humanity—permanently united to his divinity—we are drawn into the divine life. This is why Hilary argues that Christ’s statement is not reducible to a mere unity of will. If it were only about shared intentions or beliefs, the detailed progression Christ outlines (‘I in the Father, you in me, I in you’) would be unnecessary.

Hilary reaffirms this unity through another key Johannine text:

‘As I, who am sent by the living Father, draw life from the Father, so whoever eats me will draw life from me.’

This creates a theological analogy: just as the Son receives life eternally from the Father (not created but begotten), we receive life from the Son by eating his Body and drinking his Blood. This is not mere imitation, but participation—our life is sustained by his indwelling presence.

Spiritual And Ecclesial Dimensions

For Hilary, this union is not only individual but ecclesial: all who share in the one Body are united with Christ and with each other. The Eucharist is the source of both personal sanctification and ecclesial unity. This early vision of the Church as the Body of Christ, united by the real presence of Christ in the sacrament, anticipates much later dogmatic theology, including the teachings of the Council of Trent and Vatican II.

The implication is that Christian life is not primarily about abstract belief, but about being transformed through sacramental participation in Christ’s divine-human life. It is a mystagogical reality—something into which we are initiated and continually nourished.

 Faith, Flesh, And Communion

Saint Hilary’s commentary reminds us that faith in Christ is not merely an intellectual assent but a physical and spiritual union, made possible by the Incarnation and enacted through the Eucharist. To eat the Body of Christ is to be taken into the divine communion shared between the Son and the Father. Hilary’s thought prefigures many later theological developments and remains one of the earliest and clearest expressions of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist.

In a world that often spiritualizes or reduces religion to moral teaching, Hilary’s theology calls us back to the radical mystery of the Word made flesh, and the astonishing claim that through receiving him in the sacrament, we are transformed and divinized.

Boy At Prayer | Jesus And The Trinity In The Eucharist

A Reading From The Treatise Of Saint Hilary Of Poitiers On The Trinity

If the Word has truly been made flesh and we in very truth receive the Word made flesh as food from the Lord, are we not bound to believe that he abides in us naturally? Born as a man, he assumed the nature of our flesh so that now it is inseparable from himself, and conjoined the nature of his own flesh to the nature of the eternal Godhead in the sacrament by which his flesh is communicated to us. Accordingly we are all one, because the Father is in Christ and Christ in us. He himself is in us through the flesh and we in him, and because we are united with him, our own being is in God.

He himself testifies that we are in him through the sacrament of the flesh and blood bestowed upon us: In a short time the world will no longer see me; but you will see me, because I live and you will live. On that day you will understand that I am in my Father and you in me and I in you. If he wanted to indicate a mere unity of will, why did He set forth a kind of gradation and sequence in the completion of that unity? It can only be that, since he was in the Father through the nature of Deity, and we on the contrary in him through his birth in the body, he wishes us to believe that he is in us through the mystery of the sacraments. From this we can learn the perfect unity through a Mediator; for we abide in him and he abides in the Father, and while abiding in the Father he abides in us as well – so that we attain unity with the Father. For while Christ is in the Father naturally according to his birth, we too are in Christ naturally, since he abides in us naturally.

He himself has told us how natural this unity is: He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood lives in me and I live in him. No one can be in Christ unless Christ is in him, because the only flesh which he has taken to himself is the flesh of those who have taken his.

He had earlier revealed to us the sacrament of this perfect unity: As I, who am sent by the living Father, myself draw life from the Father, so whoever eats me will draw life from me. He lives because of the Father, and as he lives because of the Father so we live because of his flesh.

Every comparison is chosen to shape our understanding, so that we may grasp the subject concerned by help of the analogy set before us. To summarise, this is what gives us life: that we have Christ dwelling within our carnal selves through the flesh, and we shall live because of him in the same manner as he lives because of the Father.

Glossary Of Terms

Incarnation
The Christian belief that the eternal Son of God (the Word) became human in the person of Jesus Christ, fully God and fully man. This is foundational to understanding Christ’s presence in the Eucharist.

Eucharist
The sacrament in which Christians receive the Body and Blood of Christ under the forms of bread and wine. Saint Hilary insists this is not symbolic but real and substantial.

Ontological
Relating to the nature of being. When Hilary speaks of a ‘natural’ union with Christ, he means a real union at the level of our very being, not just emotional or intellectual agreement.

Real Presence
A term used especially in Catholic theology to affirm that Christ is truly, substantially present in the Eucharist—not just symbolically or figuratively, but in reality.

Hypostatic Union
A theological term describing the union of Christ’s divine and human natures in one Person. This union makes it possible for Christ’s humanity to be a vehicle of divine life to us.

Arianism
A 4th-century heresy that denied the full divinity of Jesus Christ. Hilary opposed it forcefully in his writings, especially De Trinitate.

De Trinitate
Latin for ‘On the Trinity,’ this is Hilary’s major theological work, defending the full divinity of the Son and the unity of the Trinity.

Theosis
A Greek term meaning ‘divinization’ or participation in the divine nature. Hilary expresses a similar idea in Latin by speaking of our natural union with God through Christ.

Mediated Unity
The idea that we come into union with God the Father through our union with Christ the Son, who is himself united to the Father. Christ acts as the bridge between God and humanity.

Mystagogical
Related to initiation into mysteries. In Christian theology, it refers to deepening understanding of the sacraments, especially the Eucharist, through reflection and participation.

Ecclesial
Pertaining to the Church. Hilary’s teaching also implies that the Eucharist unites believers not just with Christ, but with each other in the Church.

Meditations On The Love Of Jesus Christ | Word Aloud | Prayer And Reflection
  • Psalm 86 KJV | King James Audio Bible | Word Aloud | Oliver Peers | King James Version Psalms

    Psalm 86, traditionally attributed to David, is a plea to God—a soul’s cry for mercy and guidance in times of deep need. It is a psalm that resonates with humility, encapsulating the essence of a supplicant seeking solace in the divine presence [ … ]

  • Daily Audio Bible | Love Your Enemies |Oliver Peers

    We learn so much about our true relationship with God and with other people in these Gospel verses. Perhaps we might say rather, we are reminded of so much, because these are Christian truths we have long been taught and have long known, but which often are neglected and forgotten. We are recalled in these Gospel verses to Christian truth [ … ]

  • Jesus | Gospels | Historical Jesus | Audio KJV | Oliver Peers

    Christian Art | Life Of Jesus In The Gospels | King James Audio Bible KJV The Gospel Of Saint John 14: 1-7 | King James Audio Bible YouTube: Connection With The Life Of Jesus In The Gospels | King James Audio Bible The Gospels are not just a collection of stories or teachings, but a window into the life of Jesus. By reading and reflecting on the Gospels, we gain a deeper understanding of who Jesus was and what he came to do. As we read the Gospels, we see that Jesus was a man of great compassion and love. Jesus showed mercy to the outcasts and the marginalized, and he offered healing and hope to those who were in need. He also taught with authority, challenging the religious leaders of his day and offering a new way of living based on love and service. But the Gospels are not just a history lesson. They are also an invitation for us to enter into a relationship with Jesus. By reading and meditating on the Gospels, we can come to know Jesus more personally and deeply. We can learn from his example and seek to follow in his footsteps. So we may be encouraged to read the Gospels, perhaps starting with the Gospel of Mark or the Gospel of John, as we read paying attention to how Jesus interacted with others and how he responded to different situations. We may ask ourselves what you can learn from his words and actions, and how we can apply them to our own lives. And as we read, we can allow ourselves to be drawn into a closer relationship with Jesus. There truly is an historical Jesus. May the Gospels be a source of guidance, inspiration, and transformation for us all. How Much In The Gospels Is Historical, And How Much Is Myth, Legend, Trope, Figurative Thinking? It is difficult to say with certainty how much of the Gospels is historical in the modern sense of the word and how much is myth, legend, trope, or figurative thinking. The Gospels were written some years after the events they describe, and they were written from the perspective of the early Christian community. This means that the Gospels may contain a mix of historical facts and interpretation, as well as elements of myth, legend, and figurative thinking. That being said, scholars believe that the Gospels contain a good deal of historical information. For example, the Gospels describe specific places and events, such as the places where Jesus preached and the events of his trial and Crucifixion. These details suggest that the writers of the Gospels had access to historical information and intended to provide an accurate account of what happened. On the other hand, the Gospels also contain elements that are not seen by all as historical, howsoever this goes to the root of the faith, such as the miracles performed by Jesus and the accounts of his resurrection. Some see these as legends or myths that were added to the Gospels to help convey the message of the early Christian community. The question of how much of the Gospels is historical and how much is myth, legend, or figurative thinking is complex. What is important is that we approach the Gospels with an open mind and a willingness to engage with the stories and teachings they contain. We are in the Gospels in conversation with God – and with the many people who have had such faith and conversations – as with the historical Jesus. Why Do The Gospels Say Were People Afraid Of Jesus? There are several reasons why people may have been afraid of Jesus, according to the Gospels. One reason is that Jesus was a powerful and charismatic figure who challenged the religious and political authorities of his time. He spoke out against corruption and injustice, and he called on people to repent and turn to God. This type of behaviour was seen as threatening by those in positions of power, and they may have been afraid of losing their influence or authority. Another reason is that Jesus performed many miracles, such as healing the sick and casting out demons. These miracles were seen as evidence of his divine power, and they may have made people afraid of him. Some people may have been afraid of being healed or possessed by Jesus, while others may have been afraid of what would happen if they did not believe in him. Finally, some people may have been afraid of Jesus because of the prophecies and expectations of the coming of a messiah. The Jews of Jesus’ time were looking for a saviour who would deliver them from oppression and establish a kingdom of God on earth. When Jesus arrived on the scene, he may have been seen as a threat to the status quo, and some people may have been afraid of what he might do. Might The Fear Be Related To The Fear Of God – The Injunction To Fear God? Yes, it is possible that the fear of Jesus mentioned in the Gospels may be related to the fear of God. In the Old Testament, the fear of God is often used to describe a deep reverence and awe for God, as well as a sense of humility and obedience in the face of his greatness. This fear of God is seen as a positive and necessary quality for a faithful believer, and it is often linked to the idea of fearing God’s punishment or judgement. In the New Testament, the fear of God is also mentioned, but it is often portrayed in a more positive light. For example, in the Gospel of Luke, Jesus tells his followers not to be afraid of those who can only kill the body, but to fear God, who can destroy both body and soul (Luke 12:4-5). This suggests that the fear of God is not just about punishment, but about a deep respect for […]

Search Google Here | A Holy Land Jerusalem Pilgrimage? | A Safari? | An Escape..