Christian Art | George Herbert | The Temple | The Church | Easter
George Herbert | The Temple | The Church | Easter
Rise heart; thy Lord is risen. Sing his praise
Without delayes,
Who takes thee by the hand, that thou likewise
With him mayst rise:
That, as his death calcined thee to dust,
His life may make thee gold, and much more just.
Awake, my lute, and struggle for thy part
With all thy art.
The crosse taught all wood to resound his name,
Who bore the same.
His streched sinews taught all strings, what key
Is best to celebrate this most high day.
Consort both heart and lute, and twist a song
Pleasant and long:
Or since all musick is but three parts vied
And multiplied;
O let thy blessed Spirit bear a part,
And make up our defects with his sweet art.
I got me flowers to straw thy way;
I got me boughs off many a tree:
But thou wast up by break of day,
And brought’st thy sweets along with thee.
The Sunne arising in the East,
Though he give light, and th’ East perfume;
If they should offer to contest
With thy arising, they presume.
Can there be any day but this,
Though many sunnes to shine endeavour?
We count three hundred, but we misse:
There is but one, and that one ever.
George Herbert | The Temple | The Church | Easter
The poem is an expression of praise and resurrection, where the poet calls upon his ‘heart’ to celebrate the Lord’s resurrection and to rise spiritually with Him. The poem opens with a command to the heart to ‘Rise’ in response to the Lord’s resurrection, suggesting a spiritual ascent that mirrors Christ’s victory over death. The poet then emphasizes that, just as Christ’s death reduced the believer to ‘dust’, Jesus Christ’s new life will refine them, transforming them into something valuable and ‘just’, akin to ‘gold’. This allusion to spiritual purification conveys that through the resurrection, believers attain not only forgiveness but a path to becoming more righteous.
The poet next calls upon his ‘lute’, urging it to join in the praise with all its ‘art’. The reference to the ‘cross’ teaching ‘all wood to resound his name’ connects nature and human instruments with divine purpose, as though all creation can participate in proclaiming God’s glory. Similarly, the stretched ‘sinews’ and ‘strings’ taught by Christ’s suffering suggest that Jesus Christ’s sacrifice brings harmony to everything, from the human heart to musical instruments, pointing to a universal resonance with Christ’s resurrection.
In the following stanza, the poet seeks a partnership between ‘heart and lute’, weaving together a ‘song’ that is both ‘pleasant and long’. The phrase ‘pleasant and long’ implies that the celebration is both joyful and enduring, suitable for honoring the resurrection’s eternal significance. Here, the poet suggests that ‘all music is but three parts vied’, likely referencing the Trinity (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) as the ultimate unity and balance in music. He asks that the Holy Spirit participate in the song to compensate for human deficiencies, underscoring the belief that divine grace completes human effort.
A shift occurs as the poet reflects on the act of gathering ‘flowers to strew thy way’, recalling traditional processions for special occasions, but finds that Christ has risen ‘by break of day’ and brought ‘sweets’ with him. This underscores the idea that the resurrection is an act of divine initiative, beyond human preparation. The sun, ‘arising in the east’, brings light and fragrance, but even these natural phenomena are inferior to Christ’s resurrection. By presenting Christ’s resurrection as far surpassing earthly phenomena, the poet highlights the event’s divine nature.
In the final lines, the poet ponders whether there can be any other ‘day but this’, implying that the resurrection marks the singular, ultimate day. While there are ‘many suns’ that try to shine, they fall short of matching this day. He notes that while humans ‘count three hundred’ days, only ‘one’ truly matters—the day of resurrection, which stands outside ordinary time. This closing line suggests that the resurrection is an eternal event, outside the limitations of temporal measures and pointing to the idea of everlasting life offered through Christ’s triumph over death. The poem as a whole celebrates the resurrection’s transformative impact on both individual believers and all creation, calling for an eternal song of praise.
King James Audio Bible | KJV | King James Version King Herod There were several individuals named Herod who played significant roles in ancient history, particularly in the history of the Roman Empire and the region of Palestine. Here is a brief overview of the most notable Herods: Herod the Great: Also known as Herod I, he was a Roman client king of Judea, ruling from 37 BC to 4 BC. He is perhaps most famous for his role in the biblical story of the birth of Jesus, in which it is said that he ordered the slaughter of all male children in Bethlehem under the age of two in an attempt to kill the newborn Jesus. Herod Antipas: Also known as Herod II, he was the son of Herod the Great and ruled over Galilee and Perea, two regions in Palestine, from 4 BC to 39 AD. He is mentioned in the New Testament as the ruler who imprisoned John the Baptist and later had him beheaded. Herod Agrippa I: Also known as Herod III, he was the grandson of Herod the Great and ruled over Judea from 41 to 44 AD. He is mentioned in the New Testament as the ruler who imprisoned the apostle Paul. Herod Agrippa II: Also known as Herod IV, he was the great-grandson of Herod the Great and ruled over parts of Palestine and Syria from 50 to 100 AD. He is mentioned in the New Testament as the ruler who heard Paul’s defence before the Roman governor Festus. These rulers, who were known as the Herodian dynasty, were not Jewish but rather descended from a Greek family that had converted to Judaism. Despite this, they were appointed as rulers by the Roman Empire and were generally unpopular among the Jewish population due to their collaboration with the Roman occupation and their often brutal methods of rule. Herod The Great Herod the Great, also known as Herod I, was a Roman client king of Judea who ruled from 37 BC to 4 BC. He was born in 73 BC in Idumea, a region in southern Palestine, and was the son of Antipater the Idumean, an Edomite who had been appointed as a governor of Judea by the Roman general Pompey. Herod rose to power after the Roman general Julius Caesar appointed him as king of Judea in 40 BC. He consolidated his power over the next few years by defeating his rivals and establishing himself as the undisputed ruler of the region. As king, Herod embarked on a massive building program that included the expansion and renovation of the Temple in Jerusalem, the construction of the port city of Caesarea Maritima, and the fortification of several cities in Judea. He also commissioned the construction of a number of palaces and other buildings, including the famous Herodium, a palace-fortress located south of Jerusalem. Despite his many accomplishments, Herod was a controversial figure who was known for his harsh rule and his willingness to use violence to maintain his power. He was married several times and had a large number of children, several of whom he had executed when they posed a threat to his rule. One of the most famous stories associated with Herod is the biblical account of the birth of Jesus, in which it is said that he ordered the slaughter of all male children in Bethlehem under the age of two in an attempt to kill the newborn Jesus. According to the New Testament, Jesus was saved by his parents, who fled to Egypt, and later returned to Palestine after Herod’s death. Herod died in 4 BC at the age of 70, leaving a legacy as one of the most significant rulers in the history of ancient Palestine. Herod Antipas Herod Antipas, also known as Herod II, was the son of Herod the Great and ruled over Galilee and Perea, two regions in Palestine, from 4 BC to 39 AD. He was born in 20 BC and was named after his father’s patron, the Roman emperor Augustus. Like his father, Herod Antipas was known for his ambitious building projects, including the construction of the city of Tiberias on the Sea of Galilee and the expansion of the Temple in Jerusalem. He was also known for his political cunning and his ability to navigate the complex political landscape of the Roman Empire. Herod Antipas is mentioned in the New Testament as the ruler who imprisoned John the Baptist, a prominent religious figure who criticized Herod’s marriage to his sister-in-law, Herodias. According to the New Testament, John was eventually beheaded at the request of Herodias’ daughter, Salome, who danced for Herod and his guests at a banquet. Herod Antipas is also mentioned in the New Testament as the ruler who oversaw the trial and execution of Jesus. Although he initially wanted to release Jesus, he ultimately handed him over to the Roman authorities at the urging of the Jewish religious leaders. Herod Antipas’ rule came to an end in 39 AD when the Roman emperor Caligula exiled him to Gaul, modern-day France. He died in exile a few years later. Herod Agrippa I Herod Agrippa I, also known as Herod III, was the grandson of Herod the Great and ruled over Judea from 41 to 44 AD. He was born in 10 BC and was the son of Aristobulus and Bernice, two of Herod the Great’s children. Herod Agrippa I was well-educated and fluent in both Greek and Hebrew, and he was highly regarded by the Roman authorities for his loyalty and his ability to maintain order in Judea. He was appointed as king of Judea in 41 AD by the Roman emperor Claudius, who was impressed by his abilities and saw him as a reliable ally in the region. As king, Herod Agrippa I continued the building projects of his grandfather and expanded the Temple in Jerusalem. He also implemented a number of reforms aimed at improving the lives of the […]
The publicans (tax collectors) and other sinners are drawn to hear Jesus’ teaching. Perhaps they feel Jesus offers hope to them especially. While the scribes and Pharisees, despising sinners, find Jesus behaviour as he mixes with such people to be utterly objectionable, Jesus receives all humanity with love, understanding and, where there is faith and repentance, forgiveness. It is as if the people know that they are not condemned but can be accepted by Jesus. He offers them hope [ … ]
Saint Bernard reflects on the challenge of listening to Christ’s words and persevering in discipleship. He recalls the moment in John’s Gospel when some of Jesus’ followers turned away because they could not accept his teaching about the Eucharist (John 6:60–69). This becomes for Bernard a symbol of the two possible responses to God’s word: some recognise it as spirit and life, others find it hard and seek consolation elsewhere [ … ]
