John 20: 2-8 – The Feast of St John, Apostle and Evangelist (Audio Bible, Spoken Word)
2 Then she runneth, and cometh to Simon Peter, and to the other disciple, whom Jesus loved, and saith unto them, They have taken away the Lord out of the sepulchre, and we know not where they have laid him.
3 Peter therefore went forth, and that other disciple, and came to the sepulchre.
4 So they ran both together: and the other disciple did outrun Peter, and came first to the sepulchre.
5 And he stooping down, and looking in, saw the linen clothes lying; yet went he not in.
6 Then cometh Simon Peter following him, and went into the sepulchre, and seeth the linen clothes lie,
7 And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself.
8 Then went in also that other disciple, which came first to the sepulchre, and he saw, and believed.
Today’s Bible reading from the Gospel of St John speaks of the beloved disciple, and from earliest times we have identified this disciple with John. It is strange, however, that this identification is not made in the Gospel. It may be that in so readily equating the beloved disciple with John, we miss out on an important truth of the Gospel, which is that we are all beloved disciples – this title is not that of John only; it is open to us all.
So we may find ourselves, as the beloved disciple, at the foot of the cross with Mary. Jesus says to us then: Behold your mother, behold your son. Now, when Mary Magdalene has brought news – seemingly very distressing news – of what she has found at Jesus’ tomb, we race as the beloved disciple races in these verses to find out what has happened. There seems to be an absence of the Lord, and so we rush toward that absence urgently. What might we find when, in a situation of anxiety and doubt, we rush toward that threat of absence, where Jesus should be?
There is youthfulness to the beloved disciple. He outruns Peter, although then the beloved disciple defers to Peter on reaching Jesus’ tomb, and so Peter enters the sepulchre first. We may feel there is an interplay here between the old and the new, and we may relate this to the interplay of the Old and New Testaments. In discovering Jesus, and in beginning to believe in the Resurrection, The Old and the New are asked to show respect to one another and to enter into faith cooperatively. Jesus told us he did not come to abolish the Old Law. There is evolution, development, a natural process of growing in faith. The Old becomes the New, and there is change in that process.
Peter enters Jesus’ sepulchre and the details of what he sees are impressed on his mind. It is when the other, the beloved, disciple enters Jesus’ tomb that belief is found in these verses: ‘Then went in also that other disciple, which came first to the sepulchre, and he saw, and believed.’
When, later, Peter finds Jesus cooking some fish on the shore, following upon Jesus’ resurrection, and this the occasion of the miraculous catch of fish, Jesus asks Peter three times if he believes – three times for Peter to affirm his belief in Jesus, once for each denial on the night of the Passion. It is then that Jesus entrusts the care of his flock to Peter.
We may experience different impulses in our faith – including times of surpassing confidence and including doubts. This Christmas, let us run with the beloved disciple to discover the Resurrection, let us run in our hearts to Jesus, and let us share our faith.
‘Today we honour John, the apostle who leant on the Lord’s breast during the Last Supper. He drank the streams of the gospel from their very source, the sacred breast of the Lord. Great is his happiness, to whom the secrets of heaven were revealed.’
‘John, the apostle and evangelist, was chosen by the Lord because of his virginal purity. He was the disciple whom the Lord loved especially well.’
Christian Art | A Boy At Prayer Receives Communion | Eucharist | Jesus Saves Office Of Readings | Easter Saturday | A Reading From The Instructions To The Newly Baptized At Jerusalem | The Bread of Heaven and the Cup of Salvation ‘The bread of heaven and the cup of salvation.’ Commentary on the Jerusalem Catechesis | The Instructions To The Newly Baptized At Jerusalem The Bread of Heaven and the Cup of Salvation The reading from the Jerusalem Catecheses offers a luminous and powerful reflection on the mystery of the Eucharist, the sacrament at the very heart of Christian life. Attributed traditionally to Saint Cyril of Jerusalem, these catecheses were designed to unfold the hidden mysteries of the faith to those who had newly received baptism and first communion at the Easter Vigil. The context is important: these were not casual theological musings, but careful, pastoral teachings meant to anchor the newly-initiated in the life-giving truths they had just entered into. The heart of this passage is the unwavering assertion of the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist. Cyril does not argue cautiously; he proclaims boldly: ‘Since Christ himself has declared the bread to be his body, who can have any further doubt?’ In an era where some were tempted to interpret Christ’s words metaphorically, Cyril insists on a straightforward, literal faith. Christ’s own words — ‘This is my body… this is my blood’ — are treated as sufficient warrant for full-hearted belief. There is no room for skepticism: to doubt the Eucharist is, by implication, to doubt Christ himself. This teaching reflects a deep continuity with the apostolic faith. Already in the New Testament, St. Paul affirms, ‘The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ?’ (1 Corinthians 10:16) The Eucharist is not a mere symbol among symbols, but a sacramental participation in the living Christ. Saint Cyril continues this tradition, reinforcing that the Eucharistic elements, though appearing to human senses as bread and wine, are indeed the body and blood of the Lord. This appeals directly to the primacy of faith over sight, recalling Paul’s teaching that Christians ‘walk by faith, not by sight’ (2 Corinthians 5:7). Moreover, the catechesis emphasizes the transformative power of the Eucharist. In receiving Christ’s body and blood, the believer is made a ‘bearer of Christ’ — a Christophoros. Here, the early Church’s mystical understanding of the sacraments is beautifully clear: to receive the Eucharist is not only to commemorate Christ, but to be conformed to him, to be transfigured into his likeness. Saint Peter’s phrase that Christians are made ‘partakers of the divine nature’ (2 Peter 1:4) finds vivid application here: the Eucharist draws us into the very life of God. Cyril is also careful to explain how the Old Testament prefigurations — the showbread in the Temple, the manna in the desert — point to the fullness of the Eucharist. The showbread, which had meaning under the old covenant, gave way before the true ‘bread from heaven’ that Christ provides (John 6:32-35). This biblical typology strengthens the catechesis, showing that the Eucharist was not a novelty, but the culmination of God’s long preparation of his people. What was hinted at in figures has now been given in fullness. The dual effect of the Eucharist — sanctifying both body and soul — is also beautifully emphasized. The bread sanctifies the body; the Word sanctifies the soul. This integrated vision of human nature, so typical of patristic thought, avoids any dualism that would prize the soul over the body. Salvation in Christ is for the whole person. The Eucharist thus nourishes human beings at every level, preparing them not just for a spiritual existence, but for the resurrection of the body and life everlasting. The passage ends with a tender exhortation to interior purity. Echoing Paul’s words that Christians should examine themselves before receiving the body and blood of the Lord (1 Corinthians 11:28), Cyril urges his hearers to cleanse their consciences. Only with a pure heart can the Christian ‘be transformed from glory to glory’ — an allusion to 2 Corinthians 3:18 — contemplating the Lord’s glory and being conformed more and more to his image. This Holy Saturday reading, poised on the edge of the Easter Vigil, is profoundly fitting. The catechumen, freshly baptized and anointed, stands ready to partake of the Eucharist for the first time. The reading calls him or her — and by extension, all of us — to approach the altar with wonder, reverence, and firm faith, recognizing that in the humble forms of bread and wine is contained the infinite love and life of God. As the Church sings at every Mass: ‘Lord, I am not worthy that you should enter under my roof, but only say the word and my soul shall be healed.’ In the Eucharist, the word has been spoken; the healing has been given; the divine life has been offered. To Christ Jesus, true bread from heaven, be all glory and praise, now and forever. Amen. Living Memory | Pope Francis And The Eucharistic Mystery The spirit of the Jerusalem Catecheses finds a vibrant echo in the teaching of Pope Francis, who often returns to the centrality of the Eucharist in Christian life. In his apostolic exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (2013), Francis calls the Eucharist ‘not a prize for the perfect but a powerful medicine and nourishment for the weak’ (§47). This insight harmonizes deeply with the tone of the early Church’s catechesis: the Eucharist is offered not as a reward for the righteous but as the necessary food for pilgrims on the journey of faith — those who, like the neophytes of Jerusalem, are continually being transformed by grace. Moreover, Pope Francis stresses that the Eucharist is an encounter with Christ that transforms the believer into a living member of his Body. In a 2018 homily on the Feast of Corpus Christi, he spoke these striking words: ‘The Eucharist is simple food, like […]
- Daily Bible Verses | Jesus Cleanses The Temple | Towards Advent | Jesus Christ Is Love | God Is Love
One thing that emerges here is how understanding of Christ’s meaning develops and matures with time and through recollection. The people have flocked to hear Jesus’ teaching, and in Jerusalem he has a very attentive audience – of ‘all’ the people. Jesus continues, however, to speak in a veiled way, his parables deliberately concealing a part of his meaning, relating to his own divinity, to his accomplishing the inauguration of the Kingdom of God, and the great self-sacrifice to expiate our sins he is called to make [ … ]
The poem is an introspective dialogue in which Herbert contemplates a tension between worldly values and divine realities. The poem opens with an expression of disdain for the superficial trappings of honour, wealth, and beauty. These are dismissed as transient, ‘fair dust’ that, despite their allure, amount to no more than ‘gilded clay’ or ‘fine grass or hay’. This imagery diminishes worldly achievements and possessions, positioning them beneath Herbert’s spiritual footing as something to be trodden upon rather than exalted [ … ]
